Skip to Content

The SEC in the New Administration

02.27.2025

There have been a lot of developments at the Securities and Exchange Commission since Chair Gary Gensler resigned on January 20 during President Trump's inauguration.  Among the developments:

Most of those are groundbreaking, but the last one is just part of the SEC's ordinary mission of being a “cop on the beat” of financial institutions.  

In a recent speech, Acting Chair Uyeda acknowledged the historically recognized tension between the Trump Administration's goal of “democratizing” investment opportunities and the Congressionally mandated goal of protecting investors from fraud. 

And even in an unabashedly pro-cryptocurrency and digital asset administration, on February 26, 2025, the SEC announced that it had obtained partial summary judgment and a final judgment against a cryptocurrency sponsor who made false statements of fact during a 2017 initial coin offering, including by saying that the offering was regulated by the SEC and was compliant with the federal securities laws.

All the policy changes at the SEC are still playing out.  However, the SEC is still continuing the important work of investor protection and being the “cop on the beat” of Wall Street.  Toward the end of Gary Gensler's chairmanship of the SEC, there were calls that the SEC's enforcement actions had shifted from pure investor protection to prosecuting ministerial violations of the federal securities laws, such as recordkeeping violations.  While we expect enforcement priorities to change, recent actions do show that the SEC is continuing its mandate of investor protection and providing pathways for businesses' capital needs.

We continue to monitor these shifting priorities, as well as priorities at FINRA and other self-regulatory organizations, to keep clients informed of key trends in enforcement and regulation.  

We must permit access to the market place for new and budding enterprises with the minimum restraints. Whatever new forms of regulation are considered, they must be examined in the context of an evolving society designed to be driven by the innovation of the private sector and not an impediment to it. We must make sure that the creativity of our brilliant scientists and entrepreneurs is not stifled by suffocating regulation.